|
Post by Thornreaper on Dec 23, 2005 19:05:00 GMT -6
Personally, After seeing Wsay become over crowded with conversations after Reap asked for Player input(Not a bad thing) I think we should start FFTHG Political parties. Mainly, because most issues have only 2 sides and both sides are evenly matched. After Having a Lengthy Conversation with Kain, I realize that the game is fueled by Player Input. The GM's can edit the game and everything but I mean it is the players who react to the changes. Anyways. Just a thought. Any Ideas?
|
|
nesso
Investigator
Posts: 6
|
Post by nesso on Dec 23, 2005 19:08:16 GMT -6
I do. We need a third party, one no one likes but people might vote for.
|
|
Zaiyu
Explorer
What is a man?! A miserable little pile of secrets! But enough talk! Have at you!
Posts: 46
|
Post by Zaiyu on Dec 23, 2005 19:11:48 GMT -6
Hmmm...A little bit more organization would be nice...>_>
|
|
|
Post by Thornreaper on Dec 23, 2005 19:12:53 GMT -6
Its Jsut a thought. I mean possible issues are v8, ToTE arrival levels, A lot of things. Char Need's. Alting, Rushing,
|
|
|
Post by Kyou on Dec 23, 2005 19:15:20 GMT -6
Ok, I'll help with the forming of the Elitist Party.
We elitist opposethe Newb Party till the end!
Seriously tho, we need to decide what the parties would be.
|
|
|
Post by Thornreaper on Dec 23, 2005 19:17:17 GMT -6
The fucking names are the last thign to think about -_- I mean if people think That rushing is bad, others think its good. That seperates. Chances are the rushers think rushing alts is good. Rushing alts leads to rushing other people. some people oppsoe that others don't. The values of the person would match themselves to another group of people with the saem opinions.
|
|
|
Post by Kija on Dec 23, 2005 20:34:33 GMT -6
If you are able to gather up a group to represent certain ideals or perspectives, it would be interesting to see.
|
|
|
Post by Mettool on Dec 23, 2005 23:11:54 GMT -6
There should be two parties. The names should be of the following
The Picard Party vs the Batman Party
The Noob party vs. the Real people party
The O RLY party vs the YA RLY party.
Mario Party vs. Mario Party 2
And of course, there's the Mettool party which consists of Me, Ralph Nader, and a mop. Because no one ever votes for us.
|
|
|
Post by Thornreaper on Dec 23, 2005 23:20:27 GMT -6
Thats the thing though. Since everything is interconnected it'll be hard. If you have an opinion on one thing chances are it's the same on another as the same person with the same opinion on the first. We could have Debates it'd be cool. And no Mett you don't get to be with the Mop.... He's mine.. YOU CAN HAVE NADER.
|
|
|
Post by talon on Dec 23, 2005 23:26:44 GMT -6
See, now this is where that chatroom could come in handy.. I do have the hosting ability for it, or mahn could. Either way, it's something useful. All these political and/or input and the likes can be pushed into there. However, it would be a different link. So, it would also be recommended to put a key into the chat, and then get on the game. So you can just switch back and forth on, rather than 'Aw shit, you know.. lets take it to the chatroom'. As well as not missing something.
|
|
nesso
Investigator
Posts: 6
|
Post by nesso on Dec 23, 2005 23:28:38 GMT -6
Wait, wheres the self-supported pink party?
CLOUDIROTHKU FOR PREZIDENT!!1
|
|
|
Post by Thornreaper on Dec 23, 2005 23:32:37 GMT -6
Your name is NESSO! Keep it. Good Idea Reap. I do think that this could organize thoughts so everyone feels they have an input(To avoid a Mahn comment I'll say this) I know that " the Players inputs don't mean much". But it still could be helpful to game player and game moderator alike.
|
|
|
Post by Kain on Dec 24, 2005 0:07:53 GMT -6
Your name is NESSO! Keep it. Good Idea Reap. I do think that this could organize thoughts so everyone feels they have an input(To avoid a Mahn comment I'll say this) I know that " the Players inputs don't mean much". But it still could be helpful to game player and game moderator alike. That's exactly the problem with this. Our opinions only matter to a point. We're not equal to the B-Hood. If we're arguing some issue that each member of the 'Hood has made their minds up on, we could argue all we want and not change a thing. Really, the most we might get is "I understand your views, but..." People are stubborn as hell, plain and simple. I'm not saying it's a bad idea; on the contrary. But, I'd be hesitant to participate unless I was guaranteed that the B-Hood would take the things we say into serious consideration. I think it would be better if the B-Hood themselves were required to participate in some capacity, though I know having many of them in one debate is unlikely. As for the proposed Elitist party, beev.klicart.com/poorlyeditedimage.gif is all I have to say.
|
|
|
Post by Hiroshima on Dec 24, 2005 14:59:34 GMT -6
B-hood party vs. player party haha. anyway, i like the idea, goodluck, i'm off to do family traditions before Christmas, then Christmas and playing of Phoenix Wright if i get it..
|
|
|
Post by Jumin on Dec 24, 2005 20:34:33 GMT -6
... aren't most of the active people at TotE have higher levels than like.. ALL the Bhood? lol
I accept your challenge hiro! a fight to the death!! en garde! touche! HA HA HO HO!! a mere flesh wound! have at you!
(thanks reap)
|
|
|
Post by Mahn on Dec 24, 2005 21:32:46 GMT -6
If you guys care for this group crap so much, I can make a sub board to where only those of the said "political party" could make their views known. Of course, as Hiro said, Brotherhood Party *VS* said "political party" would be an interesting idea; of course, political parties are based on "Few" anyhow, not everybody could be in the "said political party". I don't want 50 people in the "said party" and it turns into chaos... Consider the idea among-st the player-base and come up with like...8-12 players to be in the "said political group". Of course, you would still need a name and leader of the "said political group" also. I would like to see how this comes to be, as to DMO's "Clan Committee" was a complete and utter failure . Send me an email regarding the "said name" of the "said political party" along with the leader or "co-leaders" if two and I could very well create a sub-board for these matters. I could also very well composite, if need to, the chat-room to only allow those "said political party" members in it. Anyways, have fun with this.
|
|
|
Post by Hiroshima on Dec 25, 2005 9:09:36 GMT -6
uhm, Mahn, i suggested the B-Hood vs. other unless your talking about something completely differend
|
|
|
Post by Thornreaper on Dec 28, 2005 0:23:23 GMT -6
It would be kinda cool. But to get real recognition a huge event would happen, like a big Debate over current issues. So we'd need to do like an "open-house" over wsay, and then get interest sparked and come up with issues that people actually are concerned about.
|
|
|
Post by Ambush Magnet on Dec 28, 2005 7:48:29 GMT -6
Screw that... how about you make, like, a debate room, and give players the option to listen in? Because, let's face it, not everyone wants to have Wsay spammed.
|
|
|
Post by Hiroshima on Dec 29, 2005 19:39:08 GMT -6
Precisely why Ignore-World exists...
|
|